Most people are not aware of the incredibly large number of motor vehicle accidents and fatalities that occur every year in the United States:
- According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in 2010 there were 32,885 motor vehicle traffic crash fatalities in the US.
- Additionally, there were an estimated 2.24 million injuries as a result of these motor vehicle crashes.
- Every year in the past there have been at least 10 million auto accidents and in some years more than 13 million.
- According to projections, there will be at least 10 million more accidents every year.
With so many accidents occurring every year, it is quite likely that you have already witnessed one or more accidents already. And it is even more likely that you will witness one or more accidents in the future. The question is, if you witness a car accident, what are you supposed to do, if anything?
Practical Steps to Follow if You Witness a Car Accident:
- If you are in your car and you witness a serious motor vehicle accident, maintain a safe distance from the vehicle(s) – suggestions range from 100 ft. to 1000 ft. – and pull over to the side of the road.
- Turn on your emergency blinkers.
- If you have a phone, immediately call 911 and report the accident. If you don’t have a phone, ask another person to call 911.
- If you have road flares, you may choose to place them several hundred feet in front of and behind the vehicles. Make absolutely sure that the flares do not come into contact with leaking gasoline on the ground. If there is a risk of an explosion from leaking gas, do not light them.
- If there is an injured person in a vehicle who cannot get out, or if they are unconscious, many experts recommend not moving the person because of the possible harm that may result. It is usually recommended, if possible, to wait until professional emergency help arrives.
- However, if there is a fire and a very likely possibility of an explosion, or if there are other compelling reasons such as intense bleeding, this obviously raises other concerns.
- Most jurisdictions have “Good Samaritan Laws” that protect certain persons from liability if they render aid in emergency situations. In some jurisdictions, the Good Samaritan Law protects all persons. In other jurisdictions the Law protects only professionals such as emergency technicians and medical doctors.
- Some Good Samaritan Laws actually require a person to offer reasonable aid at the scene of an emergency situation. What is “reasonable aid?” In some circumstances, calling 911 is all that a person can do. Obviously not everyone is capable of offering physical assistance, nor should they.
You may choose to take photographs of the accident scene with your cellphone camera, as well as take notes of what you observed. Record the license plates, makes of cars, persons in the vehicles, and other important points. When help arrives, you may offer this information to the authorities. You may be issued a summons to testify as a witness if there is a future case in court. You also may be questioned by attorneys, insurance adjusters and/or other persons who have a legitimate interest in the accident. Your observations may be of extreme importance to the parties in the case and to law enforcement. Just be as clear and truthful as possible. If you or someone you love is involved in a car accident caused by the negligence of someone else, contact an experienced Dallas accident attorney for a free legal consultation.
If you’ve ever contracted an STD, you know how embarrassing it can be. This is part of the reason why most people don’t think of STDs as being as common as they are – people who have or have had these diseases don’t want to talk about it! But how common are the different kinds of STDs exactly? Which is the most common? The answer can depend on your age, gender, sexual history, sexual orientation, or a number of other factors. The CDC reports that an average of 15 million sexually transmitted diseases are contracted every year. A majority of the cases are young people – in fact, about half of them will get an STD by the time they turn 25. These are some of the diseases you could be at risk for, and how likely your partners are to carry them.
1. Chlamydia
The most common STD in the U.S. is chlamydia. It affects around 3 million people per year, most of them sexually active young women or teenagers. One of the reasons it’s so common is because many people have no symptoms or don’t see symptoms for up to a month after infection, at which time they can experience discharge and a burning sensation when they urinate. The good news is that it’s easily treated with antibiotics.
2. Gonorrhea
Gonorrhea is very similar to chlamydia, only slightly less common. About 700,000 people get gonorrhea a year. It’s also a bacterial infection that is easily treated with antibiotics and also primarily found in young women, though young men in their early twenties are at risk as well. If you are under 25 and sexually active, you are most at risk for gonorrhea and chlamydia. And if you’re a woman, these conditions can lead to Pelvic Inflammatory Disease and infertility.
3. Genital Herpes
You may have heard horror stories about how common genital herpes is in America. It’s true that over 15 percent of adults have the disease, and it affects a much wider group of people than most STDs. Again, women are more likely to have it, because it’s easier to transmit to a woman than a man. Many people don’t know they have herpes, and it can be a dangerous risk because it is an incurable, lifelong condition that can leave you taking daily medication to suppress outbreaks.
4. Hepatitis B
The onset of the Hepatitis B vaccine for children has eliminated a lot of risk, but around 40,000 new cases of HBV occur every year. Many adults are on the recommendation list for the vaccine, including anyone with multiple sex partners and homosexual men. It’s not as common as it once was, but there are still 1.5 million people living with the chronic form of the disease, which can damage your liver and cause cancer.
5. HIV
In the past two decades, medical science, sex education, and social movements have done an amazing job at containing HIV. Not only is it easier to treat, it is much less common. But 50,000 cases of HIV are still diagnosed every year, and it is still an incurable disease that attacks your immune system and shortens your life, especially if left untreated so it develops into AIDS.
It’s easy to see patterns with STDs – the more serious ones are less common, but the impact they have on your life make diagnosing them just as important. Among more common STDs, young women are usually the majority of cases – though almost all of these women are infected by men. If you have multiple sex partners, you are probably at greater risk for an STD than you think, which is why getting tested is never a thing of the past.
John Martin writes for healthcare blogs. If you’re in Philadelphia and are concerned about your sexual health, find Philadelphia locations for std testing.
Pradaxa is an oral drug designed specifically to prevent the formation of clots and reduce the risk of strokes. This drug is targeted for individuals suffering from atrial fibrillation not caused by a heart valve problem. Pradaxa works as an anticoagulant, meaning it thins a patient’s blood. Like any drug though, Pradaxa has pros and cons. If you suffer from atrial fibrillation and are considering taking Pradaxa to reduce your risk of a stroke, read on for an unbiased consideration of the drug’s pros and cons.
What Are the Advantages of Pradaxa?
There are alternative drugs to Pradaxa on the market, such as Warfarin and Aspirin. However, the clear advantage of Pradaxa is that it does reduce the risk of strokes in patients who have atrial fibrillation not caused by a heart valve problem. In fact, Pradaxa reduces an individual’s stroke risk 35 percent more than Warfarin does. Pradaxa is given to individuals with atrial fibrillation, but only if they present a second risk factor for strokes, such as hypertension, diabetes, or a family history of strokes.
Pradaxa is also ideal for individuals who have just had a hip or knee replacement operation, as it will prevent the formation of blood clots.
Unlike Warfarin, Pradaxa does not require regular blood tests to ensure that a normalized ratio is maintained; the oral blood thinner is simply taken by the individual. Another advantage of Pradaxa is that there are no restrictions: one doesn’t need to be wary about taking the drug with or without food, or having to cut certain foods out of their diet. Pradaxa does not require a lifestyle change.
What Are the Drawbacks of Pradaxa?
Like many drugs, there are drawbacks and unfortunateside effects that could occur. As it is a blood thinner, the main problem Pradaxa has been causing is severe bleeding. In 2011, there were several instances of the drug causing fatal hemorrhaging. Bleeding is seen to be a side effect for 1 in 10 people on the drug. While this is also a side effect for Warfarin, Pradaxa presents a higher rate of gastrointestinal bleeding meaning Pradaxa is not prescribed to individuals who have recently had GI ulcers. GI bleeding occurs because Pradaxa contains tartaric acid, which lowers the gastric pH.
Other side effects of excessive internal bleeding can also occur, such as unusual bruising, unexpected swelling, headaches, and dizziness.
Pradaxa is thought to increase an individual’s risk of a heart attack, and cannot be prescribed to a wide range of individuals. For example, people with renal impairment, those who are at high risk of bleeding, those who have recently had brain or spinal surgery, among others, cannot be prescribed Pradaxa.
The FDA has had to make more safety reports on this drug than any other drug currently on the market, including Warfarin. Additionally, how safe Pradaxa is beyond two years’ of use is unknown. Consider these pros and cons of Pradaxa before seeing your doctor, and understand that there are alternatives out there. If you have recently taken Pradaxa and you are experiencing any of these side effects, considering speaking with a legal professional. Experienced legal guidance can help you receive compensation if you weren’t aware, or weren’t properly informed, of the risks the drug poses.
Janet, Jenner & Suggs, LLC is a Pradaxa injury law firm located in Baltimore, Maryland/Columbia, South Carolina/Asheville, North Carolina. For more information, please visit www.pradaxa-lawsuits.com.
What Are the Advantages of Pradaxa?
There are alternative drugs to Pradaxa on the market, such as Warfarin and Aspirin. However, the clear advantage of Pradaxa is that it does reduce the risk of strokes in patients who have atrial fibrillation not caused by a heart valve problem. In fact, Pradaxa reduces an individual’s stroke risk 35 percent more than Warfarin does. Pradaxa is given to individuals with atrial fibrillation, but only if they present a second risk factor for strokes, such as hypertension, diabetes, or a family history of strokes.
Pradaxa is also ideal for individuals who have just had a hip or knee replacement operation, as it will prevent the formation of blood clots.
Unlike Warfarin, Pradaxa does not require regular blood tests to ensure that a normalized ratio is maintained; the oral blood thinner is simply taken by the individual. Another advantage of Pradaxa is that there are no restrictions: one doesn’t need to be wary about taking the drug with or without food, or having to cut certain foods out of their diet. Pradaxa does not require a lifestyle change.
What Are the Drawbacks of Pradaxa?
Like many drugs, there are drawbacks and unfortunateside effects that could occur. As it is a blood thinner, the main problem Pradaxa has been causing is severe bleeding. In 2011, there were several instances of the drug causing fatal hemorrhaging. Bleeding is seen to be a side effect for 1 in 10 people on the drug. While this is also a side effect for Warfarin, Pradaxa presents a higher rate of gastrointestinal bleeding meaning Pradaxa is not prescribed to individuals who have recently had GI ulcers. GI bleeding occurs because Pradaxa contains tartaric acid, which lowers the gastric pH.
Other side effects of excessive internal bleeding can also occur, such as unusual bruising, unexpected swelling, headaches, and dizziness.
Pradaxa is thought to increase an individual’s risk of a heart attack, and cannot be prescribed to a wide range of individuals. For example, people with renal impairment, those who are at high risk of bleeding, those who have recently had brain or spinal surgery, among others, cannot be prescribed Pradaxa.
The FDA has had to make more safety reports on this drug than any other drug currently on the market, including Warfarin. Additionally, how safe Pradaxa is beyond two years’ of use is unknown. Consider these pros and cons of Pradaxa before seeing your doctor, and understand that there are alternatives out there. If you have recently taken Pradaxa and you are experiencing any of these side effects, considering speaking with a legal professional. Experienced legal guidance can help you receive compensation if you weren’t aware, or weren’t properly informed, of the risks the drug poses.
Janet, Jenner & Suggs, LLC is a Pradaxa injury law firm located in Baltimore, Maryland/Columbia, South Carolina/Asheville, North Carolina. For more information, please visit www.pradaxa-lawsuits.com.
This article is brought to you by Reiff & Bily in Philadelphia, PA. If you are in need of a Philadelphia personal injury lawyer, the attorneys at Reiff & Bily are among the top in the state. Contact them for a free consultation at (215) 246-9000
Disbarment is the temporary or permanent loss of a license to practice law, and removal of an attorney from the bar association in the state which he or she was licensed. An attorney disciplinary hearing takes place to determine whether the behavior exhibited by an attorney justifies disbarment.
The American Bar Association’s Rule of Professional Conduct 8.5 states that a lawyer is subject to disbarment, or any disciplinary action, under the rules of the jurisdiction where the lawyer is admitted to practice, regardless of where the lawyer’s conduct occurs. The conduct of an attorney which willfully disregards the interests of a client may result in disbarment. Such behavior can be exhibited in a number of different ways.
In most states, perjury and financial fraud are serious crimes that would qualify an attorney for disbarment. Attorneys who knowingly mismanage clients’ accounts, shuffle paperwork for financial gain, or engage in misappropriation of funds face severe penalties and the possibility of disbarment.
Gross personal misconduct that breaches the state’s rules of legal ethics can also justify an attorney’s disbarment. Each state has rules which govern attorney behavior and require that they avoid conflicts of interest and any number of other unethical practices. Some states will look into the social media accounts of attorneys who are under investigation in order to search for serious substance abuse and other personal misconduct. Non-financial moral misconduct does not often lead to disbarment because there are lesser punishments that are typically imposed instead. Such consequences are fines, censure and license suspension.
Finally, failure to comply with a state’s licensing requirements can disbar an attorney. The bar association will look at technicalities like payments and dues, as well as more serious requirements like the completion of continuing legal education.
Attorney disbarment is quire rare, but is encouraged in qualifying cases to promote lawyer-client transparency, and to ensure that clients receive the fairest of treatment.
It is never a good decision to drink and drive, but those individuals that do should always know beforehand what they will do when they are caught. Individual logic can differ depending on the level of the impaired driving charge. All states now have a tiered statute and they employ comprehensive punishments associated with this criminal behavior. Legislatures and prosecutors take this very seriously. The personal protocol stems from the severity of the charge.
The First and Second DUI
All states have enhanced their impaired driving laws in the past ten years. Most of the prosecution changes address multiple offenders. A first driving-under-the-influence charge normally carries no jail time with a fine in the $500 range. One problem with an initial charge is that starts the time period in which an offender can receive an enhanced charge for any subsequent impaired driving charges. The time frame for most states is five to seven years.
It is important to remember that the state cannot use field sobriety tests or field breath analysis to establish probable cause. However, the results of field sobriety tests can be used as reasonable suspicion and the driver can be apprehended and taken to an official blood alcohol level measuring device. Refusal to take a test can result in an additional driving privilege suspension of at least one year. Refusing the test becomes an additional charge. Driving privilege suspensions for a first DUI are normally 30 days. A second charge usually receives a one-year suspension of privileges. If the defendant chooses to take either case to trial, then refusing the test may be an effective strategy, but there can be consequences.
Multiple Offenders
A Merced DUI lawyer points out that as individuals move up the scale of enhanced charges, the possibility of being indicted for a felony can occur. In most states takes effect on the fourth driving-under-the-influence charge. The primary evidence in these cases is the blood alcohol level determination. Driving privileges are often suspended for five years. Refusing the test can enhance the charges of any case, but the absence of the documentation may also be the defending attorney’s best bargaining chip.
Anyone arrested on a multiple offenders charge should not offer any information when being questioned. The best plan is to have an experienced DUI attorney that can accept the case immediately. Once the attorney indicates he will be counsel, the questioning stops and all communication with the court is filed with the attorney. Calling an attorney immediately can also be an advantage for setting bail and determining the appropriate prosecution assessment. Cases that will go to the grand jury for indictment will take much longer to adjudicate, and the prosecution will know that the defendant is serious about fighting the case.
Always keep in mind that states have set strict minimums for impaired driving charges in order to keep the court from plea bargaining cases at their own will. This is a very serious issue for legislatures in each state. The most important component of enhanced charges is that the prosecution is not just entitled to a conviction. Many impaired driving offenders are on the borderline with their blood alcohol content level. The intoxication level to be presumed impaired is .08 for all classifications of charges. Incarceration periods for felony DUI charges range from one to five years in a state facility and suspension times begin from the day of the conviction, so a prison sentence could last longer than the driving privilege suspension.
Anthony Joseph is a writer and editor who contributes this article for DUI defense awareness. Merced DUI lawyer, Terry Wapner has practiced law for 25 years and is a member of both the National College of DUI Defense and the California DUI Lawyers Association. Attorney Wapner can defend your DUI charges in the King, Merced, Stanislaus, Madera or Tulare County areas of California.
Southern Florida is a trendy area of the United States, and it’s known for its vibrant cultural scene and warm, sandy beaches. Unfortunately, South Florida is also known for something else – traffic accidents. Whether minor or severe, traffic accidents can cause injuries, financial difficulties, legal complications and more. Anyone involved in an accident there, regardless of fault, will best be served by partnering with an accident attorney.
Hazards Unique to South Florida
Because Florida has a lot to offer, people from all over the world travel to the area each year to take in the sights and sounds. Sadly, tourists rarely know the road rules and directions, putting drivers in the area at a much higher risk of getting into an accident. In addition, South Florida experiences some heavy storms coming in from the Gulf Coast each year, and these storms can make driving very difficult, even for experienced drivers. Finally, like many areas of the country, it also has its share of poorly-maintained roads, many of which contain potholes and cracks. These hazards can cause accidents and injuries, and one might not even notice them until they’re right up on them.
Was it Truly Your Fault?
If you’ve been told that you were at fault in an accident, it’s important to remember that you really might not have been at fault at all. As mentioned, there are a number of roadway hazards that are unique to the area, and they may have actually been to blame in your accident. Unfortunately, proving this in court can be difficult, and that’s why it’s important to work with an accident attorney. By consulting with Miami auto accident lawyers, you can help them investigate the specific circumstances of your accident, and they can then go on to prove your innocence in court by pointing out the real culprit.
Can’t I Defend Myself?
While you certainly have the right to defend yourself in court, most people feel that doing so is a bad idea. Unless you have experience in the courtroom, the process can be complex and difficult. First, you’ll need to know the courtroom’s procedures, and even though you’ve watched plenty of crime shows on television, the reality of how things work when in front of a judge is often much different. In addition, you’ll need to understand the rules regarding evidence, witnesses, presenting your case, obtaining police reports, filing motions and more. On your own, all of this can be time consuming, expensive and confusing.
What Else is on the Line?
Aside from offering you legal expertise in court, an attorney can also help you in other ways. If you’re found guilty of a serious motor vehicle crime, such as reckless driving or vehicular manslaughter, you’ll likely have the conviction on your criminal record for the rest of your life. This can ultimately affect everything from future job prospects to your right to drive. By receiving a solid defense from an attorney, you can potentially avoid these consequences as your attorney will do everything he or she can to prove your innocence.
Finally, it’s important to be aware of your surroundings and use common sense when driving in South Florida or anywhere else. Because of the unique hazards in the South Florida area, drivers are encouraged to use extra precaution, especially during the tourist and storms seasons.
Ann Bailey is a frequent driver in Southern storm road hazards, and urges motorists to seek professional help in any related accident situation. TheMiami auto accident lawyers at Steinger, Iscoe and Green aggressively work to exonerate their clients when road conditions have grievously contributed to car accidents in Southern Florida.
Any Victorian gaming establishment featuring video poker machines will soon need to upgrading their machines to conform with federal laws. Owners will have to install a new limiting technology that gives players a chance to set a hard limit on how much money they can lose in one session. This simple but powerful upgrade is very controversial among gamers, venue owners and politicians. Another part of the law limits the amount that a player can withdraw from an ATM in a venue to just $250, but this won’t affect Victoria because it has even stricter laws.
The government developed reforms for pokies control in November. However, the legislation was changed significantly before it was approved. Establishments lobbied for an additional two years to comply with the rules. This means that venues can wait until 2018 to install these limiting devices on their equipment. Michael O’Brien, the current Victorian Gaming Minister, has announced that the province is pushing to set the limit even closer by instituting precommitment upgrades by 2016.
The federal laws have slightly different requirements for establishments based on the number of poker machines they host. Establishments featuring at least 20 gaming machines can delay their precommitment until 2018, which accounts for most of the businesses in Victoria. Smaller places, with just 10 or 11 games, have a chance to delay the changes until 2022. Any establishment hosting under 10 machines don’t need to install any upgrades right away, but will need to implement the technology on any new machines they add.
Victoria passed a series of statewide laws recently as well that are slightly stricter than the ones at the federal level. However, the representatives report that they won’t clash with the other reform measures. Victorian lawmakers also pushed to remove ATMs from gaming venues earlier this year and implemented the rule in July. This is all part of a bigger focus on curbing the development of gambling addictions in the communities of Victoria. Early reports show that this may have cut spending in the venues by a full $62 million.
The Victorian Gaming Minister also said that the province is aiming to act as a role model for gaming reform through the country. They have developed their own independent foundation to encourage responsible gaming, along with increased support to help train staff at gaming venues. More details will be announced after the new year.
The government developed reforms for pokies control in November. However, the legislation was changed significantly before it was approved. Establishments lobbied for an additional two years to comply with the rules. This means that venues can wait until 2018 to install these limiting devices on their equipment. Michael O’Brien, the current Victorian Gaming Minister, has announced that the province is pushing to set the limit even closer by instituting precommitment upgrades by 2016.
The federal laws have slightly different requirements for establishments based on the number of poker machines they host. Establishments featuring at least 20 gaming machines can delay their precommitment until 2018, which accounts for most of the businesses in Victoria. Smaller places, with just 10 or 11 games, have a chance to delay the changes until 2022. Any establishment hosting under 10 machines don’t need to install any upgrades right away, but will need to implement the technology on any new machines they add.
Victoria passed a series of statewide laws recently as well that are slightly stricter than the ones at the federal level. However, the representatives report that they won’t clash with the other reform measures. Victorian lawmakers also pushed to remove ATMs from gaming venues earlier this year and implemented the rule in July. This is all part of a bigger focus on curbing the development of gambling addictions in the communities of Victoria. Early reports show that this may have cut spending in the venues by a full $62 million.
The Victorian Gaming Minister also said that the province is aiming to act as a role model for gaming reform through the country. They have developed their own independent foundation to encourage responsible gaming, along with increased support to help train staff at gaming venues. More details will be announced after the new year.
The idea behind the red light camera isn’t a new one. As a matter of fact, the first red light ticketing camera was installed in New York City all the way back in 1993, a full 18 years before the first one was installed in my neck of the woods. Since the first one went in, 24 states have adopted similar systems, citing their effectiveness in reducing the number of accidents that occur at exceptionally busy intersections. So, do they? Reduce the number of accidents?
The answer is a bit complicated. It takes a lot of research, reading, interpretation and postulating to come to a real conclusion. The good news for us is that Jonathan Ramsey, special correspondent for AOL Autos has done the legwork for us. He’s reviewed 10 studies, both for and against the argument at hand and here is what he’s found:
So, do red light cameras really reduce accidents and potential injuries? The jury is still out. Yes, most studies will say that the more severe accidents are reduced, the overall number of accidents remains much the same with the increase in other types of collisions. From the Virginia study (as quoted by Jonathon Ramsey): “These results cannot be used to justify the widespread installation of cameras because they are not universally effective. These results also cannot be used to justify the abolition of cameras, as they have had a positive impact at some intersections and in some jurisdictions. The report recommends, therefore, that the decision to install a red light camera be made on an intersection-by-intersection basis. In addition, it is recommended that a carefully controlled experiment be conducted to examine further the impact of red light programs on safety and to determine how an increase in rear-end crashes can be avoided at specific intersections.
So, why do cities continue to use them?
The short answer is because the one thing that all red light cameras do is generate revenue. As long as these cameras continue to make money, you can bet your bottom dollar that they will remain. One key item that was noted by studies that back the red light camera opposition was the length of the yellow light cycle. Studies have shown that by increasing the length of the yellow light duration and installing a delay in the cross traffic’s signal to green you can reduce the same number of accidents as the red light cameras, without the benefit of the additional income.
Andrew Miller is an avid legal blogger and manager of over 20 attorney blogs. This article was written on behalf of Paul J. Tafelski.
The answer is a bit complicated. It takes a lot of research, reading, interpretation and postulating to come to a real conclusion. The good news for us is that Jonathan Ramsey, special correspondent for AOL Autos has done the legwork for us. He’s reviewed 10 studies, both for and against the argument at hand and here is what he’s found:
- Red light cameras are effective in reducing the number of T-bone or broadside accidents that occur at the intersection where they are installed. This is really good news since this is the worst type of accident to be involved in, according to the IIHS. Not all of the studies agreed on just how much, but a greater portion of the studies agreed that overall, there was a reduction in this type of accident.
- Red light cameras are minimally effective in reducing other types of accidents including cross traffic accidents and right turn on red accidents. But the evidence isn’t incredibly overwhelming in these instances either.
- Red light cameras are universally responsible for increasing the instance of rear end collisions at intersections where they are installed. Yes, you read it right. You are more likely to be involved in a rear end collision when stopping at an intersection with a red light camera installed. As a matter of fact, the Federal Highway Administration conducted a very thorough study of this situation and noted that rear end collisions rose nearly 15% at intersections where these cameras were installed.
So, do red light cameras really reduce accidents and potential injuries? The jury is still out. Yes, most studies will say that the more severe accidents are reduced, the overall number of accidents remains much the same with the increase in other types of collisions. From the Virginia study (as quoted by Jonathon Ramsey): “These results cannot be used to justify the widespread installation of cameras because they are not universally effective. These results also cannot be used to justify the abolition of cameras, as they have had a positive impact at some intersections and in some jurisdictions. The report recommends, therefore, that the decision to install a red light camera be made on an intersection-by-intersection basis. In addition, it is recommended that a carefully controlled experiment be conducted to examine further the impact of red light programs on safety and to determine how an increase in rear-end crashes can be avoided at specific intersections.
So, why do cities continue to use them?
The short answer is because the one thing that all red light cameras do is generate revenue. As long as these cameras continue to make money, you can bet your bottom dollar that they will remain. One key item that was noted by studies that back the red light camera opposition was the length of the yellow light cycle. Studies have shown that by increasing the length of the yellow light duration and installing a delay in the cross traffic’s signal to green you can reduce the same number of accidents as the red light cameras, without the benefit of the additional income.
Andrew Miller is an avid legal blogger and manager of over 20 attorney blogs. This article was written on behalf of Paul J. Tafelski.
An amendment to the City of Chesterfield’s laws could soon allow pit bulls at an off-leash dog park, and the debate is raging as to whether to allow the change, with Council members both advocating for breed-specific language and opposing it.
The City Council will vote on December 3 to amend its dog leash laws by removing breed-specific language targeted at pit bulls and pit bull mixes. Eberwein Park is currently open to off-leash animals but current language in the city’s laws forbids “dangerous breeds,” of which pit bulls are considered one. This language effectively bans the breed from the off-leash park. Removing the breed-specific language will allow pit bull owners the same park privileges as those of other dogs.
Currently, the majority of city council members believe breed-specific language should be used and dog owners should be targeted who train dogs to be aggressive or do not keep them under control. However, Mayor Bruce Geiger is a proponent of the language, having witnessed a pit bull attack on another dog. “It’s intense . . . not pretty,” he is quoted as saying.
City Administrator Mike Herring said that city police had conducted research that led to the conclusion that pit bulls are as safe as any other breed if raised properly. He believes that the language has barred people from adopting dogs from local shelters.
Breed Statistics Tell The Story
While the argument continues over breed-specific legislation, the statistics on dog attacks tell their own story. According to the Centers for Disease Control, there are more than 4.7 million dog bites each year in the United States, and at least 386,000 require emergency medical treatment. Of those treated, 16 victims die per year on average.
Of the 238 deaths from dog bites reported to the CDC in the years 1979-1988, 66 were pit bull attacks. This means that 28 percent of all fatal dog attacks, or more than one in four, were by pit bulls. Rottweilers made up 39 of these attacks, or 16 percent. Together, these two breeds were responsible for nearly half of all fatal dog attacks in the United States during the relevant time period.
Liability Issues in Dog Attacks
While detractors of breed-specific legislation point to decreasing numbers of pit bull attacks, they may fail to note that breed-specific laws may have done some good in reducing the number of these attacks, especially in public. On the other hand, any dog can be potentially dangerous, and many dog bites occur even with “friendly” breeds such as labs or spaniels.
For the victims of dog bites, it is important to remember that most state’s laws hold the owner accountable unless the victim was illegally on the owner’s property. This means that the victim of a dog bite can collect damages from the owner of the dog including medical bills and pain and suffering. A dog bite injury attorney can assist these victims in holding owners accountable for their dog’s behavior.
The City Council will vote on December 3 to amend its dog leash laws by removing breed-specific language targeted at pit bulls and pit bull mixes. Eberwein Park is currently open to off-leash animals but current language in the city’s laws forbids “dangerous breeds,” of which pit bulls are considered one. This language effectively bans the breed from the off-leash park. Removing the breed-specific language will allow pit bull owners the same park privileges as those of other dogs.
Currently, the majority of city council members believe breed-specific language should be used and dog owners should be targeted who train dogs to be aggressive or do not keep them under control. However, Mayor Bruce Geiger is a proponent of the language, having witnessed a pit bull attack on another dog. “It’s intense . . . not pretty,” he is quoted as saying.
City Administrator Mike Herring said that city police had conducted research that led to the conclusion that pit bulls are as safe as any other breed if raised properly. He believes that the language has barred people from adopting dogs from local shelters.
Breed Statistics Tell The Story
While the argument continues over breed-specific legislation, the statistics on dog attacks tell their own story. According to the Centers for Disease Control, there are more than 4.7 million dog bites each year in the United States, and at least 386,000 require emergency medical treatment. Of those treated, 16 victims die per year on average.
Of the 238 deaths from dog bites reported to the CDC in the years 1979-1988, 66 were pit bull attacks. This means that 28 percent of all fatal dog attacks, or more than one in four, were by pit bulls. Rottweilers made up 39 of these attacks, or 16 percent. Together, these two breeds were responsible for nearly half of all fatal dog attacks in the United States during the relevant time period.
Liability Issues in Dog Attacks
While detractors of breed-specific legislation point to decreasing numbers of pit bull attacks, they may fail to note that breed-specific laws may have done some good in reducing the number of these attacks, especially in public. On the other hand, any dog can be potentially dangerous, and many dog bites occur even with “friendly” breeds such as labs or spaniels.
For the victims of dog bites, it is important to remember that most state’s laws hold the owner accountable unless the victim was illegally on the owner’s property. This means that the victim of a dog bite can collect damages from the owner of the dog including medical bills and pain and suffering. A dog bite injury attorney can assist these victims in holding owners accountable for their dog’s behavior.
A case reported in The Daily Mail on Friday (9 November 2012) reveals Mrs Justice Baron’s reasoning behind a £8.7 million payout by a husband (estimated to be worth more than £35 million), to his former wife.
The parties (identified only as Mr and Mrs Y) were married for 26 years but the Relationship Breakdown occured after the husband became ‘very enamoured’ of a ‘young artist/singer’.
The customary financial remedy proceedings were issued and the wife sought £11.2 million. The husband offered £7 million. The Judge (in her Judgment released yesterday) awarded £8.7 million to the wife.
After incurring £1.1 million in legal costs (collectively), the husband contended payment of this sum would be ‘gut-wrenching’. However, the Judge dismissed this, holding he was a ‘member of an illustrious family with many successful forbears who managed to accumulate great wealth. In fact, his ancestors, who include prominent military commanders, made a large contribution to the life of the nation in the 19th century.’
Baron J was satisfied the wife had not been ‘disingenuous or tactical’ in seeking to re-start her new life in London; nor were her general expectations ‘outlandish’.
I suspect that many (and particularly the men) who read this Judgment will form the view that this result is highly unfair and demonstrates the outlandish generosity visited by the English family legal system on wives who fund ‘lavish’ lifestyles, courtesy of their husbands’ wealth post-Divorce.
In reality, section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 clearly establishes the principles that must guide a court considering any financial remedy application, to include one involving the fabulously wealthy. Judges adopt a pragmatic approach when deciding how Financial Resources are to be shared. This case is no different. The husband in this case retained his Oxfordshire estate with 11 acres of gardens and 1,500 acres of farmland, left to him by his grandparents. His estate also includes 14 homes in the same village, two in a neighbouring village and one in a nearby town, a farm with 350 acres adjoining the main estate and a pub and equestrian centre in the village. I think he’ll manage to struggle by.
English Judges are increasingly inclined to give weight to Pre-Nuptial Agreements when deciding financial remedy cases. The outcome in Mr and Mrs Y’s case might have been dramatically different if there had been a properly prepared agreement in place. The corollary to the cries that English Judges are too generous to wives is the ability of spouses to regulate what happens on marriage breakdown through pre-nuptial agreements. This case is a salutary lesson about the wisdom of obtaining legal advice about one’s potential entitlements and obligations on marriage breakdown sooner rather than later!
If you would like to talk to any of our specialist Family Law Solicitors please contact them on 0800 916 9055, or e-mailenquiries@rjwslatergordon.co.uk.
Our Family Lawyers operate across the country and can offer immediate and accessible representation anywhere in England & Wales.
The parties (identified only as Mr and Mrs Y) were married for 26 years but the Relationship Breakdown occured after the husband became ‘very enamoured’ of a ‘young artist/singer’.
The customary financial remedy proceedings were issued and the wife sought £11.2 million. The husband offered £7 million. The Judge (in her Judgment released yesterday) awarded £8.7 million to the wife.
After incurring £1.1 million in legal costs (collectively), the husband contended payment of this sum would be ‘gut-wrenching’. However, the Judge dismissed this, holding he was a ‘member of an illustrious family with many successful forbears who managed to accumulate great wealth. In fact, his ancestors, who include prominent military commanders, made a large contribution to the life of the nation in the 19th century.’
Baron J was satisfied the wife had not been ‘disingenuous or tactical’ in seeking to re-start her new life in London; nor were her general expectations ‘outlandish’.
I suspect that many (and particularly the men) who read this Judgment will form the view that this result is highly unfair and demonstrates the outlandish generosity visited by the English family legal system on wives who fund ‘lavish’ lifestyles, courtesy of their husbands’ wealth post-Divorce.
In reality, section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 clearly establishes the principles that must guide a court considering any financial remedy application, to include one involving the fabulously wealthy. Judges adopt a pragmatic approach when deciding how Financial Resources are to be shared. This case is no different. The husband in this case retained his Oxfordshire estate with 11 acres of gardens and 1,500 acres of farmland, left to him by his grandparents. His estate also includes 14 homes in the same village, two in a neighbouring village and one in a nearby town, a farm with 350 acres adjoining the main estate and a pub and equestrian centre in the village. I think he’ll manage to struggle by.
English Judges are increasingly inclined to give weight to Pre-Nuptial Agreements when deciding financial remedy cases. The outcome in Mr and Mrs Y’s case might have been dramatically different if there had been a properly prepared agreement in place. The corollary to the cries that English Judges are too generous to wives is the ability of spouses to regulate what happens on marriage breakdown through pre-nuptial agreements. This case is a salutary lesson about the wisdom of obtaining legal advice about one’s potential entitlements and obligations on marriage breakdown sooner rather than later!
Contact our specialist Family team
If you would like to talk to any of our specialist Family Law Solicitors please contact them on 0800 916 9055, or e-mailenquiries@rjwslatergordon.co.uk.
Our Family Lawyers operate across the country and can offer immediate and accessible representation anywhere in England & Wales.
Finding talented employees is a significant problem for the construction industry. The recent recession impacted the industry substantially, and many experienced and skilled employees left the industry for other opportunities. A construction consultant can assist contractors and clients in keeping construction injury lawsuits down by finding the right employees for a particular project. More importantly, they help contractors understand when they do not have the right employees.
The Right Skills
In commercial construction, contractors and clients alike will often use existing employees to complete work on a project. Many commercial sites have maintenance personnel employed at the location prior to initiating a project, and using the employees to work on the project may seem to be an attractive idea. The idea behind using an existing employee is that the cost will be reduced over hiring outside laborers, the laborers are familiar with the existing chain of command, and the workers are familiar with the site.
This is a common mistake. Many in-house personnel are not contractors or individuals accustomed to working for contractors. As a result, the employees often do not understand the methodology of a particular phase of the project, and hence will not complete their assigned tasks. Skilled welders and electricians will not perform optimally when assigned complicated tasks outside their existing knowledge base. This frequently results in the employer or the contractor having to direct every action of every employee. Such a requirement will add stress to the contractor and client and delay the project.
Time Constrictors
Poor quality work performed by employees is worse than incomplete work. If the work is detected immediately, employers can direct the employee to complete the task again. Even a quick detection will cause a delay in time and a loss of material. In some circumstances, the work may not be detected until an inspector reviews the site at a later date for code compliance; addressing structural defects on a site under construction can bring the project to a halt and increase costs dramatically. The contractor may also gain a reputation for poor work, which can destroy his business.
Delays are common in the construction industry, and, as advised by our building trade sources at Construx Solutions, labor problems are one reason why this is the case. Unskilled laborers or skilled laborers without relevant skills can be a false economy. Most contractors and workers in the construction industry would never use the wrong tool for a task, and workers are assets like any other. Rather than hammer a round peg into a square hole, clients and contractors must find the right employees from the start.
Legal Problems
Poor hiring decisions can not only delay a project, but also expose contractors and clients to liability. If an employee does not have the skills required to complete a task, the employee will either not complete the task at all or will return low quality work. Employees without experience in certain areas can also become injured, exposing the builder to huge legal costs.
Injuries are common in construction. If the contractors and clients have used unskilled employees for skilled tasks, the unskilled employee may expose the contractor and client to liability in the event that an accident occurs. If an injury occurs as a result of an inept worker, the injured party’s attorney will argue that the contractor and clients were liable vicariously and for their own negligence. The cost savings of having unskilled employees perform skilled tasks can be eliminated by a single lawsuit or workers’ compensation claim.
Critical Solutions
With an experienced overview, construction consultants can help contractors and clients avoid regulatory pitfalls. As compliance costs continue to increase, understanding worker rights and employer obligations becomes increasingly complex. Protective equipment can be required by law, different categories of waste must be disposed of properly, and changing building codes can inflate costs. Failing to report employees properly can also cause tax consequences and problems with workers’ compensation claims.
For an independent contractor or home builder, keeping abreast of these various issues may be impossible. An experienced consultant with years working in the industry can help guide small business owners through the legal and practical hazards associated with completing a project. A consultant can help builders avoid delays, civil liability, and administrative issues.
Ann Bailey reports on legal issues in the building industry to benefit workers and owners in the trade. The creatively-tuned consulting team at Construx Solutions, based in Atlanta GA, assist their clients who own and manage construction businesses with all aspects of the building processes that involve legal and personnel elements.
The Sunshine State of Florida is home to warm weather and year-round parties that draw in hundreds of thousands of motorcyclists each year. Tragically, despite the good times, Florida sees more than 100,000 motorcycle accidents that cause injuries every year and over 2,000 that end fatally.
Daytona Beach, Florida hosts the second-largest annual motorcycle rally in North America, with a yearly turnout of approximately 500,000 motorcyclists and participation consistently increasing year after year. Although Bike Week death rates have been on the decline since 2006, Florida law enforcement is stepping up and taking action to prevent further Bike Week fatalities. After 2006 BIke Week saw 20 fatalities of both motorcycle participants and nonparticipants, the state authorities focused their priority on road safety. In 2010 the rally had an all-time low of highway fatalities, in 2011 three were killed and in this year’s Bike Week eight deaths were reported.
The traffic congestion of 500,000 riders and a party-like atmosphere join to create a dangerous environment. Impaired drivers and riders is the largest contributing factor in Bike Week multiple-vehicle collisions, while lack of experience is the number one cause of single-vehicle crashes.
Florida has no helmet law for riders over the age of 21, and in 2011 helmet use in the state was observed at 49.3%. Before 2008 motorcycle fatalities were on a steady increase, and since that year there has been a significant drop in both deaths and injuries. The implementation of Florida’s Motorcycle Safety Coalition and the new rider training requirements that were put into place in July 2008 significantly contributed to this decrease. Florida cites “increases in motorcycle endorsements” as another reason for the drop.
The Daytona Chamber of Commerce has listed the next Bike Week as March 8-17, 2013 and will be charging a nominal fee of $5 per vehicle per day.
This article is brought to you by the Daytona Beach personal injury attorneys of Politis & Matovina. If you have been injured in a motorcycle accident do not hesitate to contact your local injury lawyer. They can help you recover compensation before your injuries and bills turn into a financial burden.
Daytona Beach, Florida hosts the second-largest annual motorcycle rally in North America, with a yearly turnout of approximately 500,000 motorcyclists and participation consistently increasing year after year. Although Bike Week death rates have been on the decline since 2006, Florida law enforcement is stepping up and taking action to prevent further Bike Week fatalities. After 2006 BIke Week saw 20 fatalities of both motorcycle participants and nonparticipants, the state authorities focused their priority on road safety. In 2010 the rally had an all-time low of highway fatalities, in 2011 three were killed and in this year’s Bike Week eight deaths were reported.
The traffic congestion of 500,000 riders and a party-like atmosphere join to create a dangerous environment. Impaired drivers and riders is the largest contributing factor in Bike Week multiple-vehicle collisions, while lack of experience is the number one cause of single-vehicle crashes.
Florida has no helmet law for riders over the age of 21, and in 2011 helmet use in the state was observed at 49.3%. Before 2008 motorcycle fatalities were on a steady increase, and since that year there has been a significant drop in both deaths and injuries. The implementation of Florida’s Motorcycle Safety Coalition and the new rider training requirements that were put into place in July 2008 significantly contributed to this decrease. Florida cites “increases in motorcycle endorsements” as another reason for the drop.
The Daytona Chamber of Commerce has listed the next Bike Week as March 8-17, 2013 and will be charging a nominal fee of $5 per vehicle per day.
This article is brought to you by the Daytona Beach personal injury attorneys of Politis & Matovina. If you have been injured in a motorcycle accident do not hesitate to contact your local injury lawyer. They can help you recover compensation before your injuries and bills turn into a financial burden.
Motorcycle accidents are some of the common types of vehicle accidents and take place all over the world. Such accidents are capable of causing serious injuries and harm to the ones riding the motorcycles. Motorcycles are a lot smaller when compared to the other types of vehicles such as a car. That is why when a motorcycle collides with a car, it may have devastating consequences for the motorcycle riders.
If you have recently been injured in a motorcycle accident that you believe occurred due to the carelessness of the other vehicle, you may file a personal injury lawsuit against the responsible party. You can receive compensation by filing the lawsuit. However, in order to successfully file the claim and to win compensation, you would need first need to understand what may have caused the accident. Here are some of the common causes of motorcycle accidents:
Head on collisions with other vehicles: 56% of deaths occur due to motorcycle accidents that involve head-on collision between motorcycles and other vehicles. As far as studies show, 78% of such accidents involve a car striking the motorcycle from the front, whereas only 5% involve rear end strikes. When a car and a motorcycle are involved in a head-on collision, the motorcycle rider has zero to minimum chances of survival.
When a car makes a left-hand turn: Motorcycle riders face a great threat when a car makes a left-hand turn. Such situations are extremely dangerous for a motorcycle rider. 42% of all the motorcycle accidents occur due to cars making left hand turns. A turning car generally hits the motorcycle in situations where the motorcycle is:
These situations are also common reasons for accidents involving two cars. However, the relatively smaller size of the motorcycle makes it less visible, which is why it becomes difficult for the turning car to spot it. When a motorcycle passes cars that are within the same lane, there is a much greater threat of an accident taking place. Cars often get puzzled by the sudden maneuvering of the motorcycles.
Motorcycle accidents do occur when vehicles make left handed turns. In case of such accidents, the liability almost always goes to the vehicle. However, if it is found that the motorcycle rider was speeding or was in the wrong lane, he/she can also be partly at fault. In case if the motorcyclist is found to be partly responsible for the accident, he/she will receive lesser compensation for the injuries and damages they have suffered in the accident.
Collisions between fixed objects and motorcycles: Motorcycle accidents involving collisions between motorcycles and fixed objects are fairly common and such accidents account for 25% of deaths that occur due to motorcycle accidents. Motorcycle riders are not as protected as the car drivers, which is why when such accidents occur, the motorcyclist gets thrown hard and far. That is what makes such accidents so deadly.
Get in touch with a Palm Beach injury attorney if you are looking to file for a personal injury claim in Palm Beach.
If you have recently been injured in a motorcycle accident that you believe occurred due to the carelessness of the other vehicle, you may file a personal injury lawsuit against the responsible party. You can receive compensation by filing the lawsuit. However, in order to successfully file the claim and to win compensation, you would need first need to understand what may have caused the accident. Here are some of the common causes of motorcycle accidents:
Head on collisions with other vehicles: 56% of deaths occur due to motorcycle accidents that involve head-on collision between motorcycles and other vehicles. As far as studies show, 78% of such accidents involve a car striking the motorcycle from the front, whereas only 5% involve rear end strikes. When a car and a motorcycle are involved in a head-on collision, the motorcycle rider has zero to minimum chances of survival.
When a car makes a left-hand turn: Motorcycle riders face a great threat when a car makes a left-hand turn. Such situations are extremely dangerous for a motorcycle rider. 42% of all the motorcycle accidents occur due to cars making left hand turns. A turning car generally hits the motorcycle in situations where the motorcycle is:
- Passing the car
- Going through intersections or
- Attempting to overtake the car
These situations are also common reasons for accidents involving two cars. However, the relatively smaller size of the motorcycle makes it less visible, which is why it becomes difficult for the turning car to spot it. When a motorcycle passes cars that are within the same lane, there is a much greater threat of an accident taking place. Cars often get puzzled by the sudden maneuvering of the motorcycles.
Motorcycle accidents do occur when vehicles make left handed turns. In case of such accidents, the liability almost always goes to the vehicle. However, if it is found that the motorcycle rider was speeding or was in the wrong lane, he/she can also be partly at fault. In case if the motorcyclist is found to be partly responsible for the accident, he/she will receive lesser compensation for the injuries and damages they have suffered in the accident.
Collisions between fixed objects and motorcycles: Motorcycle accidents involving collisions between motorcycles and fixed objects are fairly common and such accidents account for 25% of deaths that occur due to motorcycle accidents. Motorcycle riders are not as protected as the car drivers, which is why when such accidents occur, the motorcyclist gets thrown hard and far. That is what makes such accidents so deadly.
Get in touch with a Palm Beach injury attorney if you are looking to file for a personal injury claim in Palm Beach.
The construction industry is an important part of virtually all sectors of America’s economy. From homes to businesses, construction professionals are needed to professionally build and maintain the structures that people dwell within, but if these structures aren’t completed or looked after properly, legal issues can result.
Construction Law
As a result of the potential for such issues, construction law has become a very important part of most people’s lives in America, even if they don’t realize it. Construction law deals with issues surrounding the construction industry, but it also affects homeowners, businesses and more. For instance, if you own a home and it has defects in its construction that may endanger you and your family, you may have a basis to sue the contractor who was involved in the home’s construction. In cases such as these, construction law acts as a protection for the rights of those who are or may become injured as a result of construction errors.
For Contractors
Construction law also acts as a protector of the rights of contractors. According to construction attorneys Canfield, Madden & Ruggiero, in some circumstances even though everything was done correctly in the process of building a home or business structure, a tenant may claim that workmanship on the part of a contractor resulted in injury (even if the injury was the fault of the tenant). In such cases, construction law professionals can examine the claims and determine if the tenant is being truthful, thus protecting the contractor.
How Construction Law is Used
Like other legal constructs, construction law cases typically play out before a judge and sometimes a jury. In other cases, however, a settlement may be made between a tenant and a contractor through the use of an attorney. Construction law cases often require experts to be used to determine whether any fault lies with any party involved, and thorough inspections must be done in order to prove this. Construction law may also pertain itself with other laws regarding safety on a particular job site or methods used by employees or a particular contractor when completing a building project.
Concerned About a Construction Project?
If you’re currently concerned about a building project that you think may have harmed you or your family, or if you’re concerned about protecting yourself against the possibility of injury due to a construction project, you may want to seek out the services of a construction lawyer. Construction lawyers are often the best professionals to partner with when faced with construction concerns, and these individuals can help you to find peace of mind during and after the work is done.
Beyond a Lawsuit
Construction lawyers can also help you to decide what legal terms need to be entered into a contract when building a new home or business. Construction lawyers can meet with you and your builder to give you a real-world view of the potential for dangers involved in such a contract, and your construction lawyer can also represent your interests during any negotiations.
Finally, if you’re planning to have any work done to your home or business, it would be a good idea to look into services offered by organizations such as the Better Business Bureau regarding the contractor or contractors you’re considering hiring. Keep in mind that a little bit of time spent researching may help you to avoid a costly legal battle in the future.
Katie Hewatt is a legal researcher and contributing author for Canfield, Madden & Ruggiero, a construction law attorney group consisting of David Canfield, John Madden, John Ruggiero, and Lily Abramchayev. The firm provides superior representation during contract formation, construction phases, and provides dispute resolution services. The firm is an advocate for small business and the construction industry but also represents other business such as, soft drink companies, retailers, and restaurants.
Construction Law
As a result of the potential for such issues, construction law has become a very important part of most people’s lives in America, even if they don’t realize it. Construction law deals with issues surrounding the construction industry, but it also affects homeowners, businesses and more. For instance, if you own a home and it has defects in its construction that may endanger you and your family, you may have a basis to sue the contractor who was involved in the home’s construction. In cases such as these, construction law acts as a protection for the rights of those who are or may become injured as a result of construction errors.
For Contractors
Construction law also acts as a protector of the rights of contractors. According to construction attorneys Canfield, Madden & Ruggiero, in some circumstances even though everything was done correctly in the process of building a home or business structure, a tenant may claim that workmanship on the part of a contractor resulted in injury (even if the injury was the fault of the tenant). In such cases, construction law professionals can examine the claims and determine if the tenant is being truthful, thus protecting the contractor.
How Construction Law is Used
Like other legal constructs, construction law cases typically play out before a judge and sometimes a jury. In other cases, however, a settlement may be made between a tenant and a contractor through the use of an attorney. Construction law cases often require experts to be used to determine whether any fault lies with any party involved, and thorough inspections must be done in order to prove this. Construction law may also pertain itself with other laws regarding safety on a particular job site or methods used by employees or a particular contractor when completing a building project.
Concerned About a Construction Project?
If you’re currently concerned about a building project that you think may have harmed you or your family, or if you’re concerned about protecting yourself against the possibility of injury due to a construction project, you may want to seek out the services of a construction lawyer. Construction lawyers are often the best professionals to partner with when faced with construction concerns, and these individuals can help you to find peace of mind during and after the work is done.
Beyond a Lawsuit
Construction lawyers can also help you to decide what legal terms need to be entered into a contract when building a new home or business. Construction lawyers can meet with you and your builder to give you a real-world view of the potential for dangers involved in such a contract, and your construction lawyer can also represent your interests during any negotiations.
Finally, if you’re planning to have any work done to your home or business, it would be a good idea to look into services offered by organizations such as the Better Business Bureau regarding the contractor or contractors you’re considering hiring. Keep in mind that a little bit of time spent researching may help you to avoid a costly legal battle in the future.
Katie Hewatt is a legal researcher and contributing author for Canfield, Madden & Ruggiero, a construction law attorney group consisting of David Canfield, John Madden, John Ruggiero, and Lily Abramchayev. The firm provides superior representation during contract formation, construction phases, and provides dispute resolution services. The firm is an advocate for small business and the construction industry but also represents other business such as, soft drink companies, retailers, and restaurants.
October 15, 2012—San Bernardino, CA—CBS News reports that authorities are still searching for a hit-and-run driver who killed a man and injured a teenage girl in San Bernardino on Tuesday.
The accident occurred at the intersection of West Highland Avenue and North California Street in San Bernardino around 9:30 p.m. on October 9, according to the California Highway Patrol. Armulfo Antonio and an unidentified 16-year-old girl were crossing the street when they were hit by a dark sedan that fled the scene. Antonio was pronounced dead at the scene while the girl, who was possibly under the influence of alcohol, was treated at an area hospital.
The driver’s side mirror apparently came off in the accident and police are attempting to match it to the vehicle. Anyone with information about a dark sedan with extensive front-end damage and a missing side mirror is asked to contact the California Highway Patrol.
Would-be informants can also call the tip line sponsored by Bisnar | Chase, the WeTip crime hotline, at 800-6-Hit-N-Run (800-644-8678).
Hit-and-Run Remains a Large Problem
According to the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Reporting System, in 2010 there were a total of 147 people killed and 19,009 people injured in hit-and-run accidents. This represents about five percent of all traffic fatalities and about 12 percent of all traffic injuries. Pedestrians were four times more likely to be affected by hit-and-run drivers than any other category of victims, with 83 pedestrians making up more than half of the hit-and-run fatalities for the year.
These statistics show us that hit-and-run is not an isolated or uncommon phenomenon. The drivers who perpetrate these crimes are showing callous disregard for the lives and safety of others, and everyone should make it a priority to hold these drivers accountable, not just the victims of the accidents. Even if you are not the victim of a hit-and-run yourself, the numbers show that you could well be affected in the future, and you are also paying the costs of these accidents through higher insurance premiums whether you are a victim or not.
How Can I Help Stop Hit-and-Run Drivers?
The number one-thing you can do to help stop hit-and-run is to report any accidents that you witness. Take a moment and note the license plate number if possible. If not, get as many details about the car as possible. Immediately write these details down and report them to the police. Cooperate with officers who may want to question you or have you identify a driver at a later time.
If you are the victim of a hit-and-run, seek the professional advice of a California accident injuries attorney.
A driver’s side mirror fell off during the collision and authorities are trying to match it to a specific make and model.
Investigators say the driver did not appear to be speeding at the time of the accident.
Officials are looking for a dark colored sedan with heavy front end damage that is also missing a driver’s side mirror. Anyone with information should call the California Highway Patrol.
Press Enterprise
The accident occurred at the intersection of West Highland Avenue and North California Street in San Bernardino around 9:30 p.m. on October 9, according to the California Highway Patrol. Armulfo Antonio and an unidentified 16-year-old girl were crossing the street when they were hit by a dark sedan that fled the scene. Antonio was pronounced dead at the scene while the girl, who was possibly under the influence of alcohol, was treated at an area hospital.
The driver’s side mirror apparently came off in the accident and police are attempting to match it to the vehicle. Anyone with information about a dark sedan with extensive front-end damage and a missing side mirror is asked to contact the California Highway Patrol.
Would-be informants can also call the tip line sponsored by Bisnar | Chase, the WeTip crime hotline, at 800-6-Hit-N-Run (800-644-8678).
Hit-and-Run Remains a Large Problem
According to the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Reporting System, in 2010 there were a total of 147 people killed and 19,009 people injured in hit-and-run accidents. This represents about five percent of all traffic fatalities and about 12 percent of all traffic injuries. Pedestrians were four times more likely to be affected by hit-and-run drivers than any other category of victims, with 83 pedestrians making up more than half of the hit-and-run fatalities for the year.
These statistics show us that hit-and-run is not an isolated or uncommon phenomenon. The drivers who perpetrate these crimes are showing callous disregard for the lives and safety of others, and everyone should make it a priority to hold these drivers accountable, not just the victims of the accidents. Even if you are not the victim of a hit-and-run yourself, the numbers show that you could well be affected in the future, and you are also paying the costs of these accidents through higher insurance premiums whether you are a victim or not.
How Can I Help Stop Hit-and-Run Drivers?
The number one-thing you can do to help stop hit-and-run is to report any accidents that you witness. Take a moment and note the license plate number if possible. If not, get as many details about the car as possible. Immediately write these details down and report them to the police. Cooperate with officers who may want to question you or have you identify a driver at a later time.
If you are the victim of a hit-and-run, seek the professional advice of a California accident injuries attorney.
A driver’s side mirror fell off during the collision and authorities are trying to match it to a specific make and model.
Investigators say the driver did not appear to be speeding at the time of the accident.
Officials are looking for a dark colored sedan with heavy front end damage that is also missing a driver’s side mirror. Anyone with information should call the California Highway Patrol.
Press Enterprise
