According to statistics from the Internal Revenue Service, a total of 148,390,000 tax returns were received last year. Visits to the IRS website have increased by over two percent, too. Despite the popularity of do-it-yourself programs such as Turbo Tax and Tax ACT, many Americans will ultimately decide that they need professional help, and many seek it for the first time while filing their return.
This is great news if you work in the accounting field. However, before you start taking on new clients as tax season approaches, it’s crucial to learn that you have the right to set expectations, and let clients go if things aren’t working out. Read on for two suggestions that can help you manage clients when you work as an accountant, but can easily apply to any service industry.
Be Careful About Promising Too Much
It’s natural to want a client to see you as motivated and willing to finish a job. However, as a service provider, it’s also up to you to set expectations that are in accordance with your rates and ability levels.
In many cases, it’s not as much about about having the necessary skills as setting aside enough time in the day. For example, if a client wants rush preparation for a tax return, it might seem like an easy way to apply your knowledge carefully and efficiently.
However, tax returns, and any other type of complex paperwork can become increasingly intricate depending on a person’s specific situation. To keep your nerves intact during a client project, emphasize accuracy over speed. This will give you the time you need to do things thoroughly, without feeling that you’re crunched for time.
Similarly, be careful about making promises. In the tax industry, a client might become overly hopeful about getting a sizable return because they’re basing their expectations on past experience.
Whether you’re filling out tax forms, acting as a business advisor, or providing another particular service, remind your clients that you’ll use knowledge to the best of your abilities, but some things will simply remain out of your control.
Go With Your Instinct
Whenever you provide a service, it’s common for clients to want you to treat them as if you’re they’re your only concern in the world. They do deserve attention, but within reason. Set expectations at the beginning of your working relationship, and give details about any specific skills that you have.
If your customers are made aware of what you can offer from the beginning, they’ll be less likely to expect something that you can’t necessarily deliver to their expectations. Know your abilities, and promote them, but don’t become overly ambitious.
Finally, pay attention to your gut feeling. Often, it’ll be the first indicator that it’s time to end your relationship with clients who expect too much from you, or want you to bend over backwards to meet their needs. Ending a relationship is rarely easy, but if you feel strongly that it’s no longer a good fit, have a serious talk with your client.
No matter which industry you’re a part of, always keep things in perspective. It’s great to have a full roster of clients, but not if it puts you at risk for getting burned out. You have the right to be choosy. Good luck!
Tara Daines writes for finance blogs. If you’re interested in pursuing a degree in accounting but you don’t want to quit your day job, check out Online MS in Accounting options.
Author:
ebc
“The law already requires licensed gun dealers to run background checks, and over the last 14 years that’s kept 1.5 million of the wrong people from getting their hands on a gun.”
— President Obama, remarks on gun violence, Jan. 16, 2013
Gun-control advocates frequently cite the claim that the Brady Law has kept 1.5 million of the “wrong people” from getting a firearm, but the number has come under attack from gun-industry supporters as a bogus figure.
We've spent several days trying to unravel this question, because it is complicated and the data are sometimes murky. There are certainly gaps in the information — and a surprising lack of prosecutorial follow-up, which has further muddied the picture.
Let’s examine what is happening here.
The Facts
The Brady law — named after Ronald Reagan’s press secretary James Brady, who was gravely wounded in an assassination attempt on the president — requires federally licensed firearms sellers to check whether a purchaser is prohibited from owning a gun because of a criminal history. Generally, this is done through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) through either the FBI or state agencies.
To keep things simple, we will focus on the FBI, using a report on the 2010 data by Ronald J. Frandsen of the Regional Justice Information Service.
About 99 percent of people who apply to buy a firearm are quickly cleared. But about 1 to 2 percent are denied, mainly because the records show that he or she has a felony indictment or conviction. The data also show that about 5 percent successfully appeal their denials.
Applications: 6,037,394
FBI denials: 72,659 (1.2 percent)
Appeals 16,513 (22.7 percent)
Successful appeals 3,491 (4.77 percent of denials)
The main reason listed for a denial is a felony conviction or indictment. Here are some of the key reasons:
Felony: 34,459 (47.4 percent)
Fugitive: 13,862 (19.1 percent)
State law prohibition: 7,666 (10.6 percent)
Drug use/addiction: 6,971 (9.6 percent)
But here is where it gets complicated. After a review by an arm of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), only a tiny percentage of the cases are actually referred to ATF field divisions for possible referral to prosecutors. Here are the data for 2010 concerning FBI denials.
FBI denials referred to ATF: 76,142
Referred to field: 4,732 (6.2 percent)
Not referred to field: 68,209 (89.6 percent)
Overturned: 3,163 (4.2 percent)
At first glance, these numbers seemed astonishing. In other words, another 4 percent of initial denials were found to be wrong — and 9 out of ten were not deemed worthy of further investigation.
Then, virtually all of these cases were declined by ATF field offices. Here are some of the key reasons, with essentially one-quarter being a case of mistaken denial — even after weeks of investigation.
No proprietorial merit: 1,661
Federal/state guidelines not met: 1,092
Not a prohibited person: 480
Closed by supervisor: 457
No potential or unfounded: 396
In the end, 62 cases were referred for prosecution, but most were declined by prosecutors or dismissed by the court. Out of the original 73,000 denials, there emerges just 13 guilty pleas.
Now, let’s back up a moment. As far as we can determine, the very low rate of referrals does not mean most of the denials were “false positives” or unwarranted. But it does mean that such cases are a low priority for government prosecutors.
“Cases are referred to ATF field divisions in accordance with guidelines established by the field offices and U.S. Attorneys who work within each division’s territory. The guidelines basically cover the types of cases that are considered to be high priority,” said Frandsen. “Because the strength of a particular case will be determined by further investigation, it is more accurate to say that a case is not referred to a field division because it is not considered to be a high priority within that division.”
The current guidelines are not public and Frandsen said that ATF has not provided him with updated guidelines since at least 2006. He noted that his reports have routinely noted that “cases involving restraining orders, domestic violence misdemeanors, non-immigrant aliens, violent felonies, warrants, and indictments are most often included in referral criteria,” and ATF has never asked for an edit of this sentence.
A Justice Department official says that many fugitive cases are handled at that moment by local authorities, who simply send police to the gun shop to pick up the violator, which is why few of those cases are referred. But the official acknowledged that many other cases are difficult to prosecute, because they are essentially about having to prove that someone knowingly lied on a form. The official said priority instead is placed on potentially violent criminals.
In 2000, the Government Accountability Office issued a report that examined the referral process. It said most referrals were based on criminal history records involving violent felonies, serious drug trafficking or domestic violence misdemeanors. The report cited a lack of clear guidelines from U.S. attorneys about cases they would accept, even after ATF agents had spent as long as six months preparing the case for referral.
A 2004 report by the Justice Department Inspector General did not find much improvement, with many U.S. attorneys still not providing guidelines. Moreover, it said such cases are hard to make:
We believe that the number of referrals and prosecutions is low because of the difficulty in obtaining convictions in NICS cases. These cases lack “jury appeal” for various reasons. The factors prohibiting someone from possessing a firearm may have been nonviolent or committed many years ago. The basis for the prohibition may have been noncriminal (e.g., a dishonorable discharge from the U.S. military). It is also difficult to prove that the prohibited person was aware of the prohibition and intentionally lied to the FFL [federally licensed dealer]. We were also told that in parts of the United States where hunting historically has been part of the regional culture, juries are reluctant to convict a person who attempted to purchase a hunting rifle.
Even so, the review found that the ATF still forwarded too many cases that lacked prosecutorial merit. It also found a significant number of denials (21 percent) to applicants who should not have been prohibited from purchasing a firearm.
“The special agents we spoke with generally commented that they do not consider the vast majority of NICS referral subjects a danger to the public because the prohibiting factors are often minor or based on incidents that occurred many years in the past,” the report added. The report cited, as examples of people prohibited from buying gun, someone who had stolen four hubcaps and a person convicted in 1941 of stealing a pig. Of the cases reviewed by the IG, 48 percent of the crimes had occurred more than five years earlier — and 13 percent at least 20 years previously.
This report is 10 years old, but, if anything, the trend in referrals has decreased over the past 10 years.
We could find no study that looked at the rate of “false positives,” though a 2003 NICS Operations report said the rate had increased by 2 percent when an updated system was implemented and it was working to reduce that. The report did not specify an actual false-positive rate.
The Pinocchio Test
So where does this leave us? Even accounting for all of the appeals and overturned referrals, it seems as if 1.5 million people over the last 14 years have been denied a firearm. Whether one believes these were all the “wrong people” is more a matter of opinion, but the president is free to make that assertion. Clearly, that many people were denied a firearm — and we have no way of knowing whether how many ever obtained one in the future.
Still, we are troubled by the lack of detailed data and recent reports that might clarify why so few cases end up being referred for prosecution — especially in light of the 2004 report that said ATF agents did not find many of these people dangerous. We also are troubled by the lack of data on false positives.
But, for the moment, that is not enough to rule this is an inaccurate fact. So, lieu of more evidence, this figure rates a rare Geppetto Checkmark.
Real Facts
Keeping this avoidable danger in mind, here are some of the facts that have been discovered by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute as sobering statistics about texting and driving:
-If you text while you drive, you are increasing your chances of having an accident by over 23%.
-If you text while you drive, results show that you will have a longer response times than even drunken driving. A normal driver can respond quickly to changes in traffic and begin braking within half a second, a legally drunk driver needs four additional feet to begin braking—and a driver who’s texting needs 70 feet.
-If you are 18 to 27 years old, (or have a child in this age range) you are much more likely to be texting than people even a few years older than you. Studies report that 37% of people 18 to 27 admit to texting while driving, 14% of people 28 to 44 admit texting while driving, and 2% of people age 45 to 60 admit to texting. One could easily see the problem with the drivers with the least amount of experience being the most distracted by texting while driving.
Safer Driving
When it comes to how to stay safe on the road, it is as simple as turning your phone off when you are in the car, or at the very least resisting the urge to read or write a text while you are driving. More and more states have passed laws prohibiting texting and driving, but some say it is difficult for police to enforce. In your homes, you can stress to your children and family that no text is worth being injured themselves or hurting someone else.
This guest blog was written by Michael R. Casper, P.C. Attorney at Law, apersonal injury attorney in Gainesville, GA. Michael R.Casper has been serving Georgia for more than 30 years. He is also a dedicated workers compensation attorney in Gainesville, Georgia.
PHILADELPHIA — Federal prosecutors yesterday combined racketeering, murder and what they said were unprecedented hate-crime charges in a vast indictment against the woman accused of imprisoning mentally disabled adults in a basement so she could steal their benefit checks.
Linda Ann Weston, 52, charged along with four others, became the first person to be charged under a 2009 law that enhanced punishments for criminals who target the mentally disabled.
The 196-count indictment accuses Weston of racketeering, with murder among the underlying charges, for alleged crimes between 2001 and 2011. Weston is accused of neglect so severe that it killed two people, one in Virginia and another in Pennsylvania.
“ Shocking does not begin to describe the criminal allegations in this case,” U.S. Attorney Zane David Memeger said.
Weston’s October 2011 arrest brought to light what authorities said was one of the most inhumane crimes in Philadelphia’s history.
For years, they say, she held hostage four mentally disabled adults and her own niece to collect their Social Security benefit checks. She allegedly shuffled them from state to state and kept them in a locked, dungeon-like basement with little food.
A new international adoption law in Guatemala is delaying the adoption of 5,000 children by U.S. families.
The change was designed to make adoptions more transparent and eliminate the small percentage of illegal adoptions.
"Families who are in the process right now are very worried. Rightfully so," said Gail Stern, executive director of Mandala Adoption Services, in Hillsborough. "Having a central authority, although on paper it sounds great, in practice in a Third World country where the resources don't exist, it stops adoption."
Heather and Randy Chambers are among the families snagged in the legal tangle. The Durham couple had
Aren’t Workers Protected?
While it’s true that workers are supposed to be protected by compensation programs, the reality is that these programs are not perfect, and as a result, some injured workers are not able to benefit from them. Most workers compensation programs are underwritten by insurance companies, and this means that the insurance company ultimately decides the injured worker’s fate. Even if an injured worker’s supervisor and coworkers all back him or her in his or her injury claims, the insurance company can deny the claim, leaving the injured worker with little recourse. Liberty Mutual workers compensation is one of the larger insurance companies, and some injured workers have difficulty going through the claims process themselves, so it would be wise to get help with the process.
Why Claims Get Denied
The sad truth is, insurance companies are in business to make money, and as such, they often look for technical reasons to deny claims. For example, if an insurance policy states that injured workers will only be compensated for injuries that occur in the workplace, but an employee is injured while driving a company vehicle outside the workplace while on business, the insurance company may deny the injured worker’s claims. Using this tactic, insurance companies are often able to save money, but sadly, at the expense of injured people.
Delayed Claims
In addition, the insurance companies may also try to delay claims in order to keep from paying out. In some cases, worker’s compensation insurance companies have been known to delay claims for up to two years, all the while injured workers suffer. This practice is unethical, but as long as the insurance company can prove that it is still investigating a worker’s claim, then it is not illegal. Delayed claims by any insurer can be just as harsh as denied claims, as some delays can go on and on.
The Consequences of Denials and Delays
For injured workers, a claim denial or delay can be devastating, especially for injured workers who are no longer able to work. Without a job or a source of income, and while facing medical bills and household expenses, the pressures felt by injured workers who have been denied or had a claim delayed can seem insurmountable. In addition to the physical pain they might be in, injured workers in these situations may also experience a variety of mental and emotional complications, including depression, anxiety, insomnia and more. All of this can then lead to larger health problems, including high blood pressure and heart disease.
If you’ve been injured on the job and you’ve been denied compensation, or if you feel that your claim is being intentionally delayed by an insurance company or your employer, it’s important for you to partner with a worker’s compensation attorney for help. These attorneys will be able to investigate your claim and ensure that you are being treated properly and fairly. In many cases, just by partnering with an attorney, the insurance company that is handling your case will suddenly have a change of heart, and your claim will be processed, allowing you to get the compensation you need and deserve.
Kelly Kovacic keeps up to date with the latest information on workers compensation cases, and contributes articles for the legal community. Some people have suffered from issues related to denied or delayed Liberty Mutual workers compensation claims. The attorneys at Doyle Raizner in Houston are experts and have secured satisfactory settlements for many injured workers. The law forbids insurers from acting in bad faith toward their insured individual. But sometimes insurers do it anyway, therefore it is important to get the help you need to turn your situation around.
The fierce Hurricane Sandy has left thousands of people in heavily damaged homes, without power, heat or hot water. Many of Sandy's victims are still suffering, and living conditions are harsh for tens of thousands of people who have still been unable to return to their homes.
Hurricane Sandy destroyed the east coast and left New Jersey coastal towns, New York City and plenty of other locations with billions of dollars worth of damages. Teams are working night and day — ordering home inspections, helping people get meals, water and gas for generators.
With cases of flooding, structural damage, power outages and more, the clean-up process for Sandy is certain to be extended and costly. In a situation like this, many homeowners' insurance policies are pretty clever and do not cover the cost caused from flooding. In order for flood claims to be paid, a consumer must have already purchased a flood policy prior to the arrival of Hurricane Sandy.
Many victims may have to sue their insurance companies to get full coverage for weather related damages. In context of the present bad economy, most Americans probably cannot afford the services of an experienced lawyer.
In a situation like this, it is best for victims to get free legal advice and take advantage from pro bono legal services available online. These services have a staff of renowned lawyers and paralegals that will assist you in getting your required claim for damage caused as a result of Sandy.
Let’s hope the US law can get all damages caused as a result of the ferocious Sandy rightly claimed for ones who deserve the most…
Each year, nearly 800,000 Americans are the victims of a dog bite, which is serious enough to require medical attention. The “one free bite rule” is a name for a legal doctrine that determines if the dog owner can legally be held responsible for injuries caused by their pet. The premise under this rule allows the dog owner not to be held liable the first time their dog bites or inflicts injury to someone. However, this type of dog attack law only protects the owner if they followed all of the local laws pertaining to dogs. If the dog owner was in violation of local leash laws when the attack occurred, they can be held legally responsible. The one-bite rule would also be waived if the owner was aware or should have been aware of their dog’s propensity to be dangerous. This can be established by the following:
• The dog has a history of barking at strangers
• The dog often growls and snaps at anyone who comes near it
• The dog has a habit of jumping on others when visitors are present
• The owner often puts a muzzle on the dog
• The dog has been trained to fight other dogs
Whether the state follows the one bite rule, the dog owner can be held liable if they were negligent in the handling or confinement of a dog.
Determining Liability in Dog Bite Cases
Most states throughout the nation hold the owner of the dog strictly liable, even if the owner was not at fault. A majority of compensation claims are paid under the homeowner’s insurance policy, which includes coverage for damages and liability caused by domestic animals. The dog attack laws vary in each state, which can be broken down by these three types of liability:
• Negligence Laws—The owner is liable for the injury because the owner was careless or negligent in controlling the dog.
• Strict Liability—The owner is automatically liable for any injury or property damage the dog causes without provocation.
• One Bite Rule—The owner of the dog is not liable for damages caused the first time the dog bites a victim unless the owner knew or should have known that the dog had a propensity for violence.
Some states have moved away from the one free bite rule and the owner can be held responsible for any and all injuries caused by their dog, whether the animal has previously demonstrated vicious or aggressive tendencies. A victim may use the legal doctrine of premises liability when the person is harmed on the property of the dog owner. This is a specific form of negligence that applies to landowners and landlords. If a landlord knows that a vicious dog currently lives with one of their tenants and fails to do anything to control the dog, the landlord can be held liable. Determining liability will depend on where you live and which dog attack law applies in that state.
How a Dog Bite Lawyer Can Help
A dog owner may not be held liable if any of the following occurred during the incident:
• The victim was trespassing onto private property
• The victim was a professional that works with animals, such as a veterinarian or kennel owner
• The victim was committing a felony at the time
• The victim provoked the dog and was over the age of 5 years old at the time
• The dog was assisting the police or the military at the time
Dog bite cases can be extremely serious and cause undue consequences on the pet’s owner. Therefore, it is important to hire a personal injury attorney specializing in dog bites who will make sure that your rights are protected at all times.
Credit Scores
The first negative effect of a foreclosure is the effect that such action has on the credit scores of homeowner. No matter what the ultimate result of the foreclosure might be, whether the property is sold at short sale, or the property is voluntarily returned to the bank, the credit agencies will still treat the situation identically by noting that the homeowner paid less on a settled account. The practical effect is that the homeowner’s credit score will be downgraded, which will result in the homeowner having to pay higher rates on his credit card, auto loans, and other consumer debt.
Effect on Employment
A little known effect of a foreclosure is that it may make it more difficult for the one to obtain employment. Many employers not only make routine credit investigations as part of their hiring practice, but there are some employers that use a foreclosure as a basis for termination. Both of these situations may appear to be unfair, but employers are within their rights to take such action, and homeowners facing a potential foreclosure should be aware of these possibilities.
Deficiency Judgments
Many homeowners may be under the mistaken belief that once their property has been foreclosed on, they are free and clear of any further financial obligations for said property. Unfortunately, this is not the case. Depending on the circumstances, even after the foreclosure there may be remaining debt, and the mortgage holder may elect to pursue that. The options available to the mortgage company include taking a deficiency judgment against the homeowner and using such judgment to pursue a wage garnishment. This can be a consequence of the foreclosure that might follow the homeowner for some time and that could also jeopardize one’s employment, as some employers are not sympathetic and may use garnishment as a reason for termination.
Stress
In addition to the clear and direct consequences of foreclosure, there are also a number of more subtle consequences that homeowners should be aware of. The circumstances leading up to and continuing throughout the foreclosure process are the source of considerable stress. The pressure of trying to make payments, dealing with the mortgage company, and facing the likelihood of losing one’s home are all stress creating events. Living with day-to-day stress can cause a homeowner to act in ways that are inconsistent with his or her normal behavior, which may serve to cause them additional difficulties.
Conclusion
Foreclosures are not pleasant for anyone. The mortgage holder incurs expenses that they would like to avoid, and are burdened with disposing of the foreclosed property. Mortgage companies are not in the real estate business, and would prefer not to have this additional responsibility. The problems for the homeowner, as described above, certainly are not pleasant. The bottom line is that homeowners should make every effort to avoid foreclosure. The effects can be devastating, and it may take the homeowner years to escape them.
About the author
This article was composed by Ty Whitworth for the team atwww.manhattandallasapartments.com/.
Most people are not aware of the incredibly large number of motor vehicle accidents and fatalities that occur every year in the United States:
- According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in 2010 there were 32,885 motor vehicle traffic crash fatalities in the US.
- Additionally, there were an estimated 2.24 million injuries as a result of these motor vehicle crashes.
- Every year in the past there have been at least 10 million auto accidents and in some years more than 13 million.
- According to projections, there will be at least 10 million more accidents every year.
With so many accidents occurring every year, it is quite likely that you have already witnessed one or more accidents already. And it is even more likely that you will witness one or more accidents in the future. The question is, if you witness a car accident, what are you supposed to do, if anything?
Practical Steps to Follow if You Witness a Car Accident:
- If you are in your car and you witness a serious motor vehicle accident, maintain a safe distance from the vehicle(s) – suggestions range from 100 ft. to 1000 ft. – and pull over to the side of the road.
- Turn on your emergency blinkers.
- If you have a phone, immediately call 911 and report the accident. If you don’t have a phone, ask another person to call 911.
- If you have road flares, you may choose to place them several hundred feet in front of and behind the vehicles. Make absolutely sure that the flares do not come into contact with leaking gasoline on the ground. If there is a risk of an explosion from leaking gas, do not light them.
- If there is an injured person in a vehicle who cannot get out, or if they are unconscious, many experts recommend not moving the person because of the possible harm that may result. It is usually recommended, if possible, to wait until professional emergency help arrives.
- However, if there is a fire and a very likely possibility of an explosion, or if there are other compelling reasons such as intense bleeding, this obviously raises other concerns.
- Most jurisdictions have “Good Samaritan Laws” that protect certain persons from liability if they render aid in emergency situations. In some jurisdictions, the Good Samaritan Law protects all persons. In other jurisdictions the Law protects only professionals such as emergency technicians and medical doctors.
- Some Good Samaritan Laws actually require a person to offer reasonable aid at the scene of an emergency situation. What is “reasonable aid?” In some circumstances, calling 911 is all that a person can do. Obviously not everyone is capable of offering physical assistance, nor should they.
You may choose to take photographs of the accident scene with your cellphone camera, as well as take notes of what you observed. Record the license plates, makes of cars, persons in the vehicles, and other important points. When help arrives, you may offer this information to the authorities. You may be issued a summons to testify as a witness if there is a future case in court. You also may be questioned by attorneys, insurance adjusters and/or other persons who have a legitimate interest in the accident. Your observations may be of extreme importance to the parties in the case and to law enforcement. Just be as clear and truthful as possible. If you or someone you love is involved in a car accident caused by the negligence of someone else, contact an experienced Dallas accident attorney for a free legal consultation.
If you’ve ever contracted an STD, you know how embarrassing it can be. This is part of the reason why most people don’t think of STDs as being as common as they are – people who have or have had these diseases don’t want to talk about it! But how common are the different kinds of STDs exactly? Which is the most common? The answer can depend on your age, gender, sexual history, sexual orientation, or a number of other factors. The CDC reports that an average of 15 million sexually transmitted diseases are contracted every year. A majority of the cases are young people – in fact, about half of them will get an STD by the time they turn 25. These are some of the diseases you could be at risk for, and how likely your partners are to carry them.
1. Chlamydia
The most common STD in the U.S. is chlamydia. It affects around 3 million people per year, most of them sexually active young women or teenagers. One of the reasons it’s so common is because many people have no symptoms or don’t see symptoms for up to a month after infection, at which time they can experience discharge and a burning sensation when they urinate. The good news is that it’s easily treated with antibiotics.
2. Gonorrhea
Gonorrhea is very similar to chlamydia, only slightly less common. About 700,000 people get gonorrhea a year. It’s also a bacterial infection that is easily treated with antibiotics and also primarily found in young women, though young men in their early twenties are at risk as well. If you are under 25 and sexually active, you are most at risk for gonorrhea and chlamydia. And if you’re a woman, these conditions can lead to Pelvic Inflammatory Disease and infertility.
3. Genital Herpes
You may have heard horror stories about how common genital herpes is in America. It’s true that over 15 percent of adults have the disease, and it affects a much wider group of people than most STDs. Again, women are more likely to have it, because it’s easier to transmit to a woman than a man. Many people don’t know they have herpes, and it can be a dangerous risk because it is an incurable, lifelong condition that can leave you taking daily medication to suppress outbreaks.
4. Hepatitis B
The onset of the Hepatitis B vaccine for children has eliminated a lot of risk, but around 40,000 new cases of HBV occur every year. Many adults are on the recommendation list for the vaccine, including anyone with multiple sex partners and homosexual men. It’s not as common as it once was, but there are still 1.5 million people living with the chronic form of the disease, which can damage your liver and cause cancer.
5. HIV
In the past two decades, medical science, sex education, and social movements have done an amazing job at containing HIV. Not only is it easier to treat, it is much less common. But 50,000 cases of HIV are still diagnosed every year, and it is still an incurable disease that attacks your immune system and shortens your life, especially if left untreated so it develops into AIDS.
It’s easy to see patterns with STDs – the more serious ones are less common, but the impact they have on your life make diagnosing them just as important. Among more common STDs, young women are usually the majority of cases – though almost all of these women are infected by men. If you have multiple sex partners, you are probably at greater risk for an STD than you think, which is why getting tested is never a thing of the past.
John Martin writes for healthcare blogs. If you’re in Philadelphia and are concerned about your sexual health, find Philadelphia locations for std testing.
Pradaxa is an oral drug designed specifically to prevent the formation of clots and reduce the risk of strokes. This drug is targeted for individuals suffering from atrial fibrillation not caused by a heart valve problem. Pradaxa works as an anticoagulant, meaning it thins a patient’s blood. Like any drug though, Pradaxa has pros and cons. If you suffer from atrial fibrillation and are considering taking Pradaxa to reduce your risk of a stroke, read on for an unbiased consideration of the drug’s pros and cons.
What Are the Advantages of Pradaxa?
There are alternative drugs to Pradaxa on the market, such as Warfarin and Aspirin. However, the clear advantage of Pradaxa is that it does reduce the risk of strokes in patients who have atrial fibrillation not caused by a heart valve problem. In fact, Pradaxa reduces an individual’s stroke risk 35 percent more than Warfarin does. Pradaxa is given to individuals with atrial fibrillation, but only if they present a second risk factor for strokes, such as hypertension, diabetes, or a family history of strokes.
Pradaxa is also ideal for individuals who have just had a hip or knee replacement operation, as it will prevent the formation of blood clots.
Unlike Warfarin, Pradaxa does not require regular blood tests to ensure that a normalized ratio is maintained; the oral blood thinner is simply taken by the individual. Another advantage of Pradaxa is that there are no restrictions: one doesn’t need to be wary about taking the drug with or without food, or having to cut certain foods out of their diet. Pradaxa does not require a lifestyle change.
What Are the Drawbacks of Pradaxa?
Like many drugs, there are drawbacks and unfortunateside effects that could occur. As it is a blood thinner, the main problem Pradaxa has been causing is severe bleeding. In 2011, there were several instances of the drug causing fatal hemorrhaging. Bleeding is seen to be a side effect for 1 in 10 people on the drug. While this is also a side effect for Warfarin, Pradaxa presents a higher rate of gastrointestinal bleeding meaning Pradaxa is not prescribed to individuals who have recently had GI ulcers. GI bleeding occurs because Pradaxa contains tartaric acid, which lowers the gastric pH.
Other side effects of excessive internal bleeding can also occur, such as unusual bruising, unexpected swelling, headaches, and dizziness.
Pradaxa is thought to increase an individual’s risk of a heart attack, and cannot be prescribed to a wide range of individuals. For example, people with renal impairment, those who are at high risk of bleeding, those who have recently had brain or spinal surgery, among others, cannot be prescribed Pradaxa.
The FDA has had to make more safety reports on this drug than any other drug currently on the market, including Warfarin. Additionally, how safe Pradaxa is beyond two years’ of use is unknown. Consider these pros and cons of Pradaxa before seeing your doctor, and understand that there are alternatives out there. If you have recently taken Pradaxa and you are experiencing any of these side effects, considering speaking with a legal professional. Experienced legal guidance can help you receive compensation if you weren’t aware, or weren’t properly informed, of the risks the drug poses.
Janet, Jenner & Suggs, LLC is a Pradaxa injury law firm located in Baltimore, Maryland/Columbia, South Carolina/Asheville, North Carolina. For more information, please visit www.pradaxa-lawsuits.com.
What Are the Advantages of Pradaxa?
There are alternative drugs to Pradaxa on the market, such as Warfarin and Aspirin. However, the clear advantage of Pradaxa is that it does reduce the risk of strokes in patients who have atrial fibrillation not caused by a heart valve problem. In fact, Pradaxa reduces an individual’s stroke risk 35 percent more than Warfarin does. Pradaxa is given to individuals with atrial fibrillation, but only if they present a second risk factor for strokes, such as hypertension, diabetes, or a family history of strokes.
Pradaxa is also ideal for individuals who have just had a hip or knee replacement operation, as it will prevent the formation of blood clots.
Unlike Warfarin, Pradaxa does not require regular blood tests to ensure that a normalized ratio is maintained; the oral blood thinner is simply taken by the individual. Another advantage of Pradaxa is that there are no restrictions: one doesn’t need to be wary about taking the drug with or without food, or having to cut certain foods out of their diet. Pradaxa does not require a lifestyle change.
What Are the Drawbacks of Pradaxa?
Like many drugs, there are drawbacks and unfortunateside effects that could occur. As it is a blood thinner, the main problem Pradaxa has been causing is severe bleeding. In 2011, there were several instances of the drug causing fatal hemorrhaging. Bleeding is seen to be a side effect for 1 in 10 people on the drug. While this is also a side effect for Warfarin, Pradaxa presents a higher rate of gastrointestinal bleeding meaning Pradaxa is not prescribed to individuals who have recently had GI ulcers. GI bleeding occurs because Pradaxa contains tartaric acid, which lowers the gastric pH.
Other side effects of excessive internal bleeding can also occur, such as unusual bruising, unexpected swelling, headaches, and dizziness.
Pradaxa is thought to increase an individual’s risk of a heart attack, and cannot be prescribed to a wide range of individuals. For example, people with renal impairment, those who are at high risk of bleeding, those who have recently had brain or spinal surgery, among others, cannot be prescribed Pradaxa.
The FDA has had to make more safety reports on this drug than any other drug currently on the market, including Warfarin. Additionally, how safe Pradaxa is beyond two years’ of use is unknown. Consider these pros and cons of Pradaxa before seeing your doctor, and understand that there are alternatives out there. If you have recently taken Pradaxa and you are experiencing any of these side effects, considering speaking with a legal professional. Experienced legal guidance can help you receive compensation if you weren’t aware, or weren’t properly informed, of the risks the drug poses.
Janet, Jenner & Suggs, LLC is a Pradaxa injury law firm located in Baltimore, Maryland/Columbia, South Carolina/Asheville, North Carolina. For more information, please visit www.pradaxa-lawsuits.com.
This article is brought to you by Reiff & Bily in Philadelphia, PA. If you are in need of a Philadelphia personal injury lawyer, the attorneys at Reiff & Bily are among the top in the state. Contact them for a free consultation at (215) 246-9000
Disbarment is the temporary or permanent loss of a license to practice law, and removal of an attorney from the bar association in the state which he or she was licensed. An attorney disciplinary hearing takes place to determine whether the behavior exhibited by an attorney justifies disbarment.
The American Bar Association’s Rule of Professional Conduct 8.5 states that a lawyer is subject to disbarment, or any disciplinary action, under the rules of the jurisdiction where the lawyer is admitted to practice, regardless of where the lawyer’s conduct occurs. The conduct of an attorney which willfully disregards the interests of a client may result in disbarment. Such behavior can be exhibited in a number of different ways.
In most states, perjury and financial fraud are serious crimes that would qualify an attorney for disbarment. Attorneys who knowingly mismanage clients’ accounts, shuffle paperwork for financial gain, or engage in misappropriation of funds face severe penalties and the possibility of disbarment.
Gross personal misconduct that breaches the state’s rules of legal ethics can also justify an attorney’s disbarment. Each state has rules which govern attorney behavior and require that they avoid conflicts of interest and any number of other unethical practices. Some states will look into the social media accounts of attorneys who are under investigation in order to search for serious substance abuse and other personal misconduct. Non-financial moral misconduct does not often lead to disbarment because there are lesser punishments that are typically imposed instead. Such consequences are fines, censure and license suspension.
Finally, failure to comply with a state’s licensing requirements can disbar an attorney. The bar association will look at technicalities like payments and dues, as well as more serious requirements like the completion of continuing legal education.
Attorney disbarment is quire rare, but is encouraged in qualifying cases to promote lawyer-client transparency, and to ensure that clients receive the fairest of treatment.
It is never a good decision to drink and drive, but those individuals that do should always know beforehand what they will do when they are caught. Individual logic can differ depending on the level of the impaired driving charge. All states now have a tiered statute and they employ comprehensive punishments associated with this criminal behavior. Legislatures and prosecutors take this very seriously. The personal protocol stems from the severity of the charge.
The First and Second DUI
All states have enhanced their impaired driving laws in the past ten years. Most of the prosecution changes address multiple offenders. A first driving-under-the-influence charge normally carries no jail time with a fine in the $500 range. One problem with an initial charge is that starts the time period in which an offender can receive an enhanced charge for any subsequent impaired driving charges. The time frame for most states is five to seven years.
It is important to remember that the state cannot use field sobriety tests or field breath analysis to establish probable cause. However, the results of field sobriety tests can be used as reasonable suspicion and the driver can be apprehended and taken to an official blood alcohol level measuring device. Refusal to take a test can result in an additional driving privilege suspension of at least one year. Refusing the test becomes an additional charge. Driving privilege suspensions for a first DUI are normally 30 days. A second charge usually receives a one-year suspension of privileges. If the defendant chooses to take either case to trial, then refusing the test may be an effective strategy, but there can be consequences.
Multiple Offenders
A Merced DUI lawyer points out that as individuals move up the scale of enhanced charges, the possibility of being indicted for a felony can occur. In most states takes effect on the fourth driving-under-the-influence charge. The primary evidence in these cases is the blood alcohol level determination. Driving privileges are often suspended for five years. Refusing the test can enhance the charges of any case, but the absence of the documentation may also be the defending attorney’s best bargaining chip.
Anyone arrested on a multiple offenders charge should not offer any information when being questioned. The best plan is to have an experienced DUI attorney that can accept the case immediately. Once the attorney indicates he will be counsel, the questioning stops and all communication with the court is filed with the attorney. Calling an attorney immediately can also be an advantage for setting bail and determining the appropriate prosecution assessment. Cases that will go to the grand jury for indictment will take much longer to adjudicate, and the prosecution will know that the defendant is serious about fighting the case.
Always keep in mind that states have set strict minimums for impaired driving charges in order to keep the court from plea bargaining cases at their own will. This is a very serious issue for legislatures in each state. The most important component of enhanced charges is that the prosecution is not just entitled to a conviction. Many impaired driving offenders are on the borderline with their blood alcohol content level. The intoxication level to be presumed impaired is .08 for all classifications of charges. Incarceration periods for felony DUI charges range from one to five years in a state facility and suspension times begin from the day of the conviction, so a prison sentence could last longer than the driving privilege suspension.
Anthony Joseph is a writer and editor who contributes this article for DUI defense awareness. Merced DUI lawyer, Terry Wapner has practiced law for 25 years and is a member of both the National College of DUI Defense and the California DUI Lawyers Association. Attorney Wapner can defend your DUI charges in the King, Merced, Stanislaus, Madera or Tulare County areas of California.
Southern Florida is a trendy area of the United States, and it’s known for its vibrant cultural scene and warm, sandy beaches. Unfortunately, South Florida is also known for something else – traffic accidents. Whether minor or severe, traffic accidents can cause injuries, financial difficulties, legal complications and more. Anyone involved in an accident there, regardless of fault, will best be served by partnering with an accident attorney.
Hazards Unique to South Florida
Because Florida has a lot to offer, people from all over the world travel to the area each year to take in the sights and sounds. Sadly, tourists rarely know the road rules and directions, putting drivers in the area at a much higher risk of getting into an accident. In addition, South Florida experiences some heavy storms coming in from the Gulf Coast each year, and these storms can make driving very difficult, even for experienced drivers. Finally, like many areas of the country, it also has its share of poorly-maintained roads, many of which contain potholes and cracks. These hazards can cause accidents and injuries, and one might not even notice them until they’re right up on them.
Was it Truly Your Fault?
If you’ve been told that you were at fault in an accident, it’s important to remember that you really might not have been at fault at all. As mentioned, there are a number of roadway hazards that are unique to the area, and they may have actually been to blame in your accident. Unfortunately, proving this in court can be difficult, and that’s why it’s important to work with an accident attorney. By consulting with Miami auto accident lawyers, you can help them investigate the specific circumstances of your accident, and they can then go on to prove your innocence in court by pointing out the real culprit.
Can’t I Defend Myself?
While you certainly have the right to defend yourself in court, most people feel that doing so is a bad idea. Unless you have experience in the courtroom, the process can be complex and difficult. First, you’ll need to know the courtroom’s procedures, and even though you’ve watched plenty of crime shows on television, the reality of how things work when in front of a judge is often much different. In addition, you’ll need to understand the rules regarding evidence, witnesses, presenting your case, obtaining police reports, filing motions and more. On your own, all of this can be time consuming, expensive and confusing.
What Else is on the Line?
Aside from offering you legal expertise in court, an attorney can also help you in other ways. If you’re found guilty of a serious motor vehicle crime, such as reckless driving or vehicular manslaughter, you’ll likely have the conviction on your criminal record for the rest of your life. This can ultimately affect everything from future job prospects to your right to drive. By receiving a solid defense from an attorney, you can potentially avoid these consequences as your attorney will do everything he or she can to prove your innocence.
Finally, it’s important to be aware of your surroundings and use common sense when driving in South Florida or anywhere else. Because of the unique hazards in the South Florida area, drivers are encouraged to use extra precaution, especially during the tourist and storms seasons.
Ann Bailey is a frequent driver in Southern storm road hazards, and urges motorists to seek professional help in any related accident situation. TheMiami auto accident lawyers at Steinger, Iscoe and Green aggressively work to exonerate their clients when road conditions have grievously contributed to car accidents in Southern Florida.
